Employment discrimination law in the United States originates from the common law, and is codified in various state, federal, and local laws. These laws prohibit discrimination based upon specific qualities or "protected categories". The United States Constitution also forbids discrimination by federal and state governments against their public employees. Discrimination in the economic sector is not straight constrained by the Constitution, but has actually become based on a growing body of federal and state law, consisting of the Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964. Federal law prohibits discrimination in a variety of locations, including recruiting, working with, job examinations, promo policies, training, settlement and disciplinary action. State laws typically extend security to additional classifications or employers.

Under federal work discrimination law, companies normally can not victimize staff members on the basis of race, [1] sex [1] [2] (consisting of sexual orientation and gender identity), [3] pregnancy, [4] religion, [1] national origin, [1] impairment (physical or psychological, including status), [5] [6] age (for employees over 40), [7] military service or affiliation, [8] personal bankruptcy or uncollectable bills, [9] hereditary information, [10] and citizenship status (for residents, permanent residents, short-lived locals, refugees, and asylees). [11]

List of United States federal discrimination law

Equal Pay Act of 1963
Civil Liberty Act of 1964 Title VI of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964


Title IX

Constitutional basis

The United States Constitution does not directly address employment discrimination, but its prohibitions on discrimination by the federal government have actually been held to secure federal civil servant.

The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution restrict the power of the federal and state governments to discriminate. The Fifth Amendment has a specific requirement that the federal government does not deprive people of "life, liberty, or residential or commercial property", without due procedure of the law. It also consists of an implicit warranty that the Fourteenth Amendment explicitly forbids states from breaching a person's rights of due procedure and equivalent security. In the employment context, these Constitutional arrangements would restrict the right of the state and federal governments to discriminate in their employment practices by treating staff members, previous staff members, or job applicants unequally due to the fact that of subscription in a group (such as a race or sex). Due process defense requires that federal government staff members have a fair procedural process before they are terminated if the termination is related to a "liberty" (such as the right to free speech) or residential or commercial property interest. As both Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses are passive, the provision that empowers Congress to pass anti-discrimination bills (so they are not unconstitutional under Tenth Amendment) is Section 5 of Fourteenth Amendment.

Employment discrimination or harassment in the economic sector is not unconstitutional because Federal and most State Constitutions do not expressly provide their respective federal government the power to enact civil rights laws that use to the personal sector. The Federal federal government's authority to manage a private service, consisting of civil liberties laws, comes from their power to regulate all commerce in between the States. Some State Constitutions do expressly pay for some defense from public and private employment discrimination, such as Article I of the California Constitution. However, most State Constitutions just address inequitable treatment by the government, including a public employer.

Absent of a provision in a State Constitution, State civil rights laws that control the personal sector are typically Constitutional under the "authorities powers" teaching or the power of a State to enact laws created to protect public health, security and morals. All States need to abide by the Federal Civil Rights laws, however States may enact civil liberties laws that provide additional employment protection.

For example, some State civil liberties laws provide defense from work discrimination on the basis of political affiliation, even though such kinds of discrimination are not yet covered in federal civil liberties laws.

History of federal laws

Federal law governing work discrimination has actually developed with time.

The Equal Pay Act modified the Fair Labor Standards Act in 1963. It is imposed by the Wage and Hour Division of the Department of Labor. [12] The Equal Pay Act forbids companies and unions from paying various wages based upon sex. It does not restrict other inequitable practices in working with. It supplies that where workers perform equivalent operate in the corner requiring "equal ability, effort, and obligation and performed under similar working conditions," they need to be offered equal pay. [2] The Fair Labor Standards Act applies to employers taken part in some element of interstate commerce, or all of a company's workers if the enterprise is engaged as a whole in a significant quantity of interstate commerce. [citation required]

Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964 forbids discrimination in much more elements of the work relationship. "Title VII produced the Equal Job opportunity Commission (EEOC) to administer the act". [12] It applies to most employers taken part in interstate commerce with more than 15 staff members, labor organizations, and employment firms. Title VII forbids discrimination based upon race, color, faith, sex or national origin. It makes it unlawful for companies to discriminate based upon protected characteristics relating to terms, conditions, and advantages of employment. Employment companies may not discriminate when employing or referring applicants, and labor organizations are likewise forbidden from basing subscription or union classifications on race, color, religious beliefs, sex, or national origin. [1] The Pregnancy Discrimination Act modified Title VII in 1978, defining that unlawful sex discrimination consists of discrimination based on pregnancy, giving birth, and associated medical conditions. [4] A related statute, the Family and Medical Leave Act, sets requirements governing leave for pregnancy and pregnancy-related conditions. [13]

Executive Order 11246 in 1965 "restricts discrimination by federal contractors and subcontractors on account of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin [and] requires affirmative action by federal specialists". [14]

The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), enacted in 1968 and changed in 1978 and 1986, forbids companies from discriminating on the basis of age. The restricted practices are almost similar to those described in Title VII, except that the ADEA safeguards employees in companies with 20 or more workers rather than 15 or more. A staff member is secured from discrimination based upon age if she or he is over 40. Since 1978, the ADEA has phased out and forbade obligatory retirement, except for high-powered decision-making positions (that also offer big pensions). The ADEA includes explicit standards for advantage, pension and retirement plans. [7] Though ADEA is the center of the majority of conversation of age discrimination legislation, there is a longer history starting with the abolishment of "maximum ages of entry into work in 1956" by the United States Civil Service Commission. Then in 1964, Executive Order 11141 "established a policy against age discrimination amongst federal contractors". [15]

The Rehabilitation Act of 1973 prohibits work discrimination on the basis of impairment by the federal government, federal professionals with contracts of more than $10,000, and programs getting federal financial assistance. [16] It needs affirmative action along with non-discrimination. [16] Section 504 needs affordable accommodation, and Section 508 needs that electronic and infotech be accessible to disabled employees. [16]

The Black Lung Benefits Act of 1972 restricts discrimination by mine operators versus miners who struggle with "black lung disease" (pneumoconiosis). [17]

The Vietnam Era Readjustment Act of 1974 "requires affirmative action for handicapped and Vietnam period veterans by federal specialists". [14]

The Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978 restricts employment discrimination on the basis of personal bankruptcy or uncollectable bills. [9]

The Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 prohibits employers with more than 3 workers from discriminating versus anybody (other than an unauthorized immigrant) on the basis of nationwide origin or citizenship status. [18]

The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) was enacted to eliminate prejudiced barriers versus certified people with specials needs, individuals with a record of a special needs, or people who are regarded as having a special needs. It forbids discrimination based upon real or perceived physical or mental disabilities. It also requires employers to supply reasonable accommodations to staff members who require them due to the fact that of a special needs to get a task, perform the important functions of a job, or enjoy the advantages and benefits of employment, unless the employer can show that undue challenge will result. There are rigorous limitations on when a company can ask disability-related questions or need medical checkups, and all medical details should be treated as private. A special needs is defined under the ADA as a psychological or physical health condition that "substantially limits several significant life activities. " [5]

The Nineteenth Century Civil Rights Acts, modified in 1993, make sure all individuals equivalent rights under the law and detail the damages available to plaintiffs in actions brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the 1973 Rehabilitation Act. [19] [20]

The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 bars companies from using individuals' hereditary information when making hiring, firing, task positioning, or promotion decisions. [10]

The proposed US Equality Act of 2015 would prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity. [21] Since June 2018 [update], 28 US states do not clearly consist of sexual orientation and 29 US states do not explicitly consist of gender identity within anti-discrimination statutes.

LGBT employment discrimination

Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964 restricts work discrimination on the basis of sexual preference or gender identity. This is incorporated by the law's restriction of employment discrimination on the basis of sex. Prior to the landmark cases Bostock v. Clayton County and R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (2020 ), work defenses for LGBT people were patchwork; numerous states and regions clearly forbid harassment and predisposition in work decisions on the basis of sexual orientation and/or gender identity, although some only cover public workers. [22] Prior to the Bostock decision, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) interpreted Title VII to cover LGBT staff members; the EEOC's identified that transgender workers were protected under Title VII in 2012, [23] and extended the defense to include sexual preference in 2015. [24] [25]

According to Crosby Burns and Jeff Krehely: "Studies reveal that anywhere from 15 percent to 43 percent of gay people have actually experienced some kind of discrimination and harassment at the workplace. Moreover, an incredible 90 percent of transgender employees report some type of harassment or mistreatment on the task." Many individuals in the LGBT community have actually lost their job, including Vandy Beth Glenn, a transgender female who claims that her employer informed her that her presence may make other individuals feel uneasy. [26]

Almost half of the United States also have state-level or municipal-level laws banning the discrimination of gender non-conforming and transgender individuals in both public and personal work environments. A couple of more states ban LGBT discrimination in just public offices. [27] Some challengers of these laws believe that it would intrude on spiritual liberty, although these laws are focused more on discriminatory actions, not beliefs. Courts have actually also determined that these laws do not infringe totally free speech or religious liberty. [28]

State law

State statutes likewise offer substantial security from work discrimination. Some laws extend similar defense as provided by the federal acts to employers who are not covered by those statutes. Other statutes provide protection to groups not covered by the federal acts. Some state laws supply higher security to staff members of the state or of state specialists.

The following table lists categories not safeguarded by federal law. Age is consisted of as well, considering that federal law just covers workers over 40.

In addition,

- District of Columbia - matriculation, individual look [35]- Michigan - height, weight [53]- Texas - Participation in emergency situation evacuation order [90]- Vermont - Place of birth [76]

Civil servant

Title VII also uses to state, federal, local and other public staff members. Employees of federal and state governments have extra defenses versus work discrimination.

The Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 prohibits discrimination in federal employment on the basis of conduct that does not impact job efficiency. The Office of Personnel Management has actually interpreted this as forbiding discrimination on the basis of sexual preference. [91] In June 2009, it was revealed that the analysis would be expanded to consist of gender identity. [92]

Additionally, public staff members maintain their First Amendment rights, whereas private companies deserve to limitations staff members' speech in certain methods. [93] Public workers keep their First Amendment rights insofar as they are speaking as a civilian (not on behalf of their employer), they are speaking on a matter of public issue, employment and their speech is not interfering with their task. [93]

Federal workers who have work discrimination claims, such as postal workers of the United States Postal Service (USPS) need to take legal action against in the proper federal jurisdiction, which postures a different set of issues for complainants.

Exceptions

Bona fide occupational credentials

Employers are generally enabled to think about attributes that would otherwise be inequitable if they are bona fide occupational qualifications (BFOQ). The most common BFOQ is sex, and the 2nd most typical BFOQ is age. Authentic Occupational Qualifications can not be utilized for discrimination on the basis of race.

The only exception to this rule is demonstrated in a single case, Wittmer v. Peters, where the court rules that law enforcement security can match races when needed. For example, if police are running operations that include personal informants, or undercover agents, sending out an African American officer into a sting for a KKK white supremacy group. Additionally, authorities departments, such as the department in Ferguson, Missouri, can consider race-based policing and work with officers that are proportionate to the community's racial makeup. [94]

BFOQs do not apply in the entertainment market, such as casting for movies and television. [95] Directors, producers and casting staff are allowed to cast characters based upon physical characteristics, such as race, sex, hair color, eye color, weight, etc. Employment discrimination claims for Disparate Treatment are uncommon in the entertainment industry, particularly in performers. [95] This justification is distinct to the show business, and does not move to other markets, such as retail or food. [95]

Often, companies will utilize BFOQ as a defense to a Disparate Treatment theory work discrimination. BFOQ can not be an expense reason in wage spaces between different groups of employees. [96] Cost can be thought about when a company must balance personal privacy and safety issues with the variety of positions that a company are attempting to fill. [96]

Additionally, customer choice alone can not be a justification unless there is a privacy or safety defense. [96] For circumstances, retail facilities in rural areas can not forbid African American clerks based on the racial ideologies of the customer base. But, matching genders for staffing at centers that deal with children survivors of sexual assault is allowed.

If a company were attempting to prove that work discrimination was based on a BFOQ, there must be an accurate basis for thinking that all or considerably all members of a class would be not able to carry out the task safely and efficiently or that it is impractical to identify qualifications on a personalized basis. [97] Additionally, lack of a malicious intention does not convert a facially prejudiced policy into a neutral policy with a discriminatory result. [97] Employers also bring the burden to reveal that a BFOQ is reasonably necessary, and a lower discriminatory alternative approach does not exist. [98]

Religious work discrimination

"Religious discrimination is treating individuals in a different way in their employment due to the fact that of their religious beliefs, their faiths and practices, and/or their request for lodging (a change in a workplace rule or policy) of their religions and practices. It also includes dealing with people in a different way in their employment because of their absence of spiritual belief or practice" (Workplace Fairness). [99] According to The U.S. Equal Job Opportunity Commission, companies are forbidden from declining to work with a private based upon their religious beliefs- alike race, sex, age, and special needs. If an employee thinks that they have actually experienced religious discrimination, they need to resolve this to the alleged wrongdoer. On the other hand, workers are safeguarded by the law for reporting job discrimination and are able to submit charges with the EEOC. [100] Some places in the U.S. now have stipulations that prohibit discrimination against atheists. The courts and laws of the United States provide certain exemptions in these laws to services or institutions that are spiritual or religiously-affiliated, nevertheless, to differing degrees in various areas, depending on the setting and the context; some of these have been supported and others reversed in time.

The most recent and prevalent example of Religious Discrimination is the prevalent rejection of the COVID-19 Vaccine. Many staff members are using religions against altering the body and preventative medicine as a validation to not get the vaccination. Companies that do not allow staff members to make an application for spiritual exemptions, or reject their application might be charged by the employee with employment discrimination on the basis of religions. However, there are certain requirements for staff members to present evidence that it is a seriously held belief. [101]

Members of the Communist Party

Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964 clearly allows discrimination against members of the Communist Party.

Military

The armed force has actually dealt with criticism for restricting ladies from serving in combat functions. In 2016, nevertheless, the law was amended to allow them to serve. [102] [103] [104] In the post published on the PBS website, Henry Louis Gates Jr. discusses the method which black guys were dealt with in the military throughout the 1940s. According to Gates, throughout that time the whites offered the African Americans a possibility to show themselves as Americans by having them take part in the war. The National Geographic website states, nevertheless, that when black soldiers signed up with the Navy, they were just permitted to work as servants; their participation was limited to the roles of mess attendants, stewards, and cooks. Even when African Americans wanted to protect the nation they lived in, they were rejected the power to do so.

The Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) secures the task rights of people who willingly or involuntarily leave employment positions to carry out military service or certain kinds of service in the National Disaster Medical System. [105] The law likewise forbids employers from victimizing employees for previous or present participation or membership in the uniformed services. [105] Policies that provide choice to veterans versus non-veterans has been declared to impose systemic disparate treatment of ladies since there is a large underrepresentation of ladies in the uniformed services. [106] The court has rejected this claim because there was no discriminatory intent towards women in this veteran friendly policy. [106]

Unintentional discrimination

Employment practices that do not directly discriminate against a protected classification might still be unlawful if they produce a disparate effect on members of a secured group. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits work practices that have an inequitable effect, unless they belong to task performance.

The Act needs the removal of synthetic, approximate, and unneeded barriers to employment that run invidiously to discriminate on the basis of race, and, if, as here, a work practice that runs to exclude Negroes can not be revealed to be associated with task efficiency, it is forbidden, regardless of the employer's lack of discriminatory intent. [107]

Height and weight requirements have actually been determined by the EEOC as having a diverse effect on nationwide origin minorities. [108]

When safeguarding versus a diverse effect claim that declares age discrimination, an employer, nevertheless, does not need to show requirement; rather, employment it needs to merely show that its practice is reasonable. [citation needed]

Enforcing entities

The Equal Job Opportunity Commission (EEOC) translates and implements the Equal Pay Act, Age Discrimination in Employment Act, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title I and V of the Americans With Disabilities Act, Sections 501 and 505 of the Rehabilitation Act, and the Civil Liberty Act of 1991. [109] The Commission was developed by the Civil Rights Act of 1964. [110] Its enforcement provisions are contained in section 2000e-5 of Title 42, [111] and its policies and standards are included in Title 29 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 1614. [112] Persons wishing to submit suit under Title VII and/or the ADA should exhaust their administrative treatments by submitting an administrative problem with the EEOC prior to submitting their lawsuit in court. [113]

The Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs implements Section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act, which restricts discrimination against certified individuals with specials needs by federal contractors and subcontractors. [114]

Under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, each company has and implements its own policies that use to its own programs and to any entities that get monetary assistance. [16]

The Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices (OSC) implements the anti-discrimination provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. § 1324b, which restricts discrimination based upon citizenship status or nationwide origin. [115]

State Fair Employment Practices (FEP) offices take the role of the EEOC in administering state statutes. [113]

Employment Non-Discrimination Act
LGBT employment discrimination in the United States
Employment discrimination against individuals with criminal records in the United States
Racial wage gap in the United States
Gender pay space in the United States
Criticism of credit report systems in the United States


References

^ a b c d e "Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964". US EEOC. Archived from the initial on December 20, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "The Equal Pay Act of 1963". Archived from the initial on April 5, 2020. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ Bostock v. Clayton County, 590 U.S. ___ (2020 ).
^ a b "Pregnancy Discrimination Act". Archived from the initial on May 12, 2009. Retrieved June 18, 2009.
^ a b "Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, As Amended". ADA.gov. Archived from the initial on December 20, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Questions and Answers: The Americans with Disabilities Act and Persons with HIV/AIDS". Archived from the original on July 22, 2009. Retrieved July 21, 2009.
^ a b "The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967". Archived from the initial on December 13, 2019. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "USERRA - Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act". DOL. Archived from the initial on December 11, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b 11 U.S.C. § 525
^ a b "Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008" (PDF). gpo.gov. May 21, 2008. Archived (PDF) from the initial on November 6, 2018. Retrieved January 6, 2015.
^ 8 U.S.C. § 1324b
^ a b Blankenship, Kim M (1993 ). "Bringing Gender and Race in: U.S. Employment Discrimination Policy". Gender and Society. 7 (2 ): 204-226. doi:10.1177/ 089124393007002004. JSTOR 189578. S2CID 144175260.
^ "Family and Medical Leave Act". Archived from the original on June 18, 2009. Retrieved June 18, 2009.
^ a b Rozmarin, George C (1980 ). "Employment Discrimination Laws and Their Application". Law Notes for the Family Doctor. 16 (1 ): 25-29. JSTOR 44066330.
^ Neumark, D (2003 ). "Age discrimination legislations in the United States" (PDF). Contemporary Economic Policy. 21 (3 ): 297-317. doi:10.1093/ cep/byg012. S2CID 38171380. Archived (PDF) from the initial on June 2, 2018. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c d "Guide to Disability Rights Laws". ADA.gov. December 20, 2023. Archived from the original on November 14, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "30 USC Sec. 938". Archived from the original on June 7, 2011. Retrieved July 21, 2009.
^ "Summary of Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986". Archived from the initial on May 6, 2013. Retrieved August 14, 2021.
^ "42 U.S. Code § 1981 - Equal rights under the law". LII/ Legal Information Institute. Archived from the initial on December 16, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "42 U.S. Code § 1981a - Damages in cases of deliberate discrimination in work". LII/ Legal Information Institute. Archived from the original on November 27, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA)". Archived from the original on June 17, 2009. Retrieved June 18, 2009.
^ Tilcsik, András (January 1, 2011). "Pride and Prejudice: Employment Discrimination versus Openly Gay Men in the United States". American Journal of Sociology. 117 (2 ): 586-626. doi:10.1086/ 661653. hdl:1807/ 34998. JSTOR 10.1086/ 661653. PMID 22268247. S2CID 23542996. Archived from the original on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "In Landmark Ruling, Feds Add Transgendered to Anti-Discrimination Law:: EDGE Boston, MA". Edgeboston.com. April 25, 2012. Archived from the original on April 15, 2019. Retrieved July 17, 2015.
^ Carpenter, Dale (December 14, 2012). "Anti-gay discrimination is sex discrimination, states the EEOC". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on April 15, 2019. Retrieved July 17, 2015.
^ Tatectate, Curtis. "EEOC: Federal law prohibits work environment bias against gays, lesbians, bisexuals|Miami Herald Miami Herald". Miamiherald.com. Archived from the initial on April 28, 2019. Retrieved July 17, 2015.
^ Burns, Crosby; Krehely, Jeff (June 2, 2011). "Gay and Transgender People Face High Rates of Workplace Discrimination and Harassment". Center for American Progress. Archived from the original on November 26, 2019. Retrieved March 1, 2015.
^ "Sexual Orientation Discrimination in the Workplace". FindLaw. Archived from the initial on May 7, 2021. Retrieved March 1, 2015.
^ Lowndes, Coleman; Maza, Carlos (September 23, 2014). "The Top Five Myths About LGBT Non-Discrimination Laws Debunked". Media Matters for America. Archived from the initial on June 17, 2019. Retrieved March 1, 2015.
^ "Code of Alabama 25-1-21". Archived from the original on July 23, 2011. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ a b c "Alaska Statutes: AS 18.80.220. Unlawful Employment Practices; Exception". touchngo.com. Archived from the initial on December 6, 2022. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c d e f "Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA)". California Department of Fair Employment and Housing. CA.gov. 2010. Archived from the original on September 9, 2016. Retrieved September 9, 2016.
^ a b "Colorado Civil liberty Division 2008 Statutes" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the initial on May 21, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "Chapter 814c Sec. 46a-60". Archived from the initial on October 17, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ a b "Delaware Code Online". delcode.delaware.gov. Archived from the initial on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c d e "District of Columbia Human Rights Act of 1977; Prohibited Acts of Discrimination" (PDF). Archived from the initial (PDF) on July 23, 2009. Retrieved August 8, 2019. ^ "District of Columbia Human Rights Act of 1977; Table of Contents, General Provisions" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on July 30, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ a b "Statutes & Constitution: View Statutes:-> 2008-> Ch0760-> Section 10: Online Sunshine". www.leg.state.fl.us. Archived from the initial on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Georgia Fair Employment Practices Act". Archived from the initial on January 29, 2010. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ a b "Hawaii Rev Statutes 378-2". Archived from the initial on August 14, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Idaho Commission on Human Rights: Age Discrimination"". Archived from the original on February 21, 2018. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c "Illinois Human Rights Act". Archived from the initial on April 20, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "Indiana General Assembly". iga.in.gov. Archived from the initial on December 25, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Iowa Code 216.6". Archived from the initial on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Kansas Age Discrimination in Employment Act" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on October 6, 2008. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "Kentucky Revised Statutes 344.040" (PDF). Archived from the initial (PDF) on October 8, 2009.
^ "Louisiana Revised Statutes 23:352". Archived from the initial on May 9, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Louisiana Revised Statutes 23:312". Archived from the initial on May 9, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Louisiana Revised Statutes 23:311". Archived from the original on May 9, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Title 5, Chapter 337: HUMAN RIGHTS ACT". www.mainelegislature.org. Archived from the original on February 28, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "Annotated Code of Maryland 49B.16". Archived from the initial on September 29, 2011. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "M.G.L. 151B § 4". Archived from the initial on July 7, 2010. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "M.G.L 151B § 1". Archived from the initial on June 4, 2010. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c "Elliott-Larsen Civil liberty Act" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the initial on December 26, 2014. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c "Minnesota Statutes, area 363A.08". Archived from the original on September 6, 2015. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ " § 213.055 R.S.Mo". Archived from the initial on May 23, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "Montana Code Annotated 49-2-303". Archived from the original on September 1, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ a b "Nebraska Fair Employment Practices Act". Archived from the original on November 26, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ a b "NRS: CHAPTER 613 - EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES". www.leg.state.nv.us. Archived from the initial on December 24, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "Section 354-A:7 Unlawful Discriminatory Practices". Archived from the initial on January 2, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c d "New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (N.J.S.A. 10:5 -12)".
^ a b c "2006 New Mexico Statutes - Section 28-1-7 - Unlawful prejudiced practice". Justia Law. Archived from the initial on September 28, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c "New York State Executive Law, Article 15, Section 296". Archived from the original on October 4, 2011. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ a b "New York Labor Law Section 201-D - Discrimination against the engagement in specific activities. - New York City Attorney Resources - New York Laws". law.onecle.com. Archived from the original on April 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ " § 95-28". www.ncleg.net. Archived from the initial on April 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ " § 95-28". www.ncleg.net. Archived from the initial on December 15, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c d "North Dakota Human Rights Act" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on July 18, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ "2006 Ohio Revised Code -:: 4112. Civil Liberty Commission". Justia Law. Archived from the original on March 9, 2016. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Oklahoma Attorney General|". www.oag.ok.gov. Archived from the original on December 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c "Oregon Revised Statutes, Chapter 659A". Archived from the original on August 16, 2023. Retrieved October 17, 2019.
^ "Laws Administered by the Pennsylvania Human Rights Commission" (PDF). [irreversible dead link] ^ "State of Rhode Island General Assembly". www.rilegislature.gov. Archived from the initial on October 14, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "South Carolina Human Affairs Law". Archived from the original on May 6, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ "Tennessee State Government - TN.gov". www.tn.gov. Archived from the original on December 25, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "LABOR CODE CHAPTER 21. EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION". statutes.capitol.texas.gov. Archived from the original on September 25, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Utah Code 34A-5-106". Archived from the original on July 21, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "Vermont Fair Employment Practices Act" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on June 1, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ "Virginia Human Rights Act". Archived from the initial on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "RCW 49.60.180: Unfair practices of companies". apps.leg.wa.gov. Archived from the initial on November 29, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "RCW 49.60.172: Unfair practices with regard to HIV or hepatitis C infection". apps.leg.wa.gov. Archived from the original on April 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "RCW 49.60.174: Evaluation of claim of discrimination-Actual or viewed HIV or liver disease C infection". apps.leg.wa.gov. Archived from the original on April 20, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "RCW 49.44.090: Unfair practices in work due to the fact that of age of staff member or applicant-Exceptions". apps.leg.wa.gov. Archived from the original on April 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "State of West Virginia" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on February 16, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c d "Wisconsin Statutes Table of Contents". docs.legis.wisconsin.gov. Archived from the original on November 3, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ Wyoming Code 27-9-105 [irreversible dead link] ^ "22 Guam Code Ann. Chapter 3" (PDF). Archived from the initial (PDF) on July 19, 2011. Retrieved July 29, 2009.
^ "22 Guam Code Ann. Chapter 5" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on July 19, 2011. Retrieved July 29, 2009.
^ a b "Puerto Rico Laws 29-I-7-146". Archived from the initial on February 20, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Puerto Rico Laws PR 29-I-7-151". Archived from the original on February 20, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Virgin Islands Code on Employment Discrimination § 451". Archived from the initial on February 16, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "LABOR CODE CHAPTER 22. EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION FOR PARTICIPATING IN EMERGENCY EVACUATION". statutes.capitol.texas.gov. Archived from the initial on June 29, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Addressing Sexual Orientation Discrimination In Federal Civilian Employment: A Guide to Employee's Rights". Archived from the original on January 14, 2007.
^ Rutenberg, Jim (June 24, 2009). "New Protections for Transgender Federal Workers (Published 2009)". The New York City Times. Archived from the initial on April 20, 2023.
^ a b "Federal Employee Speech & the First Amendment|ACLU of DC". www.acludc.org. November 9, 2017. Archived from the original on September 21, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ "Justice Department Announces Findings of Two Civil Liberties Investigations in Ferguson, Missouri". www.justice.gov. March 4, 2015. Archived from the initial on August 12, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ a b c "When is it legal for an employer to discriminate in their working with practices based upon a Bona Fide Occupation Qualification?". University of Cincinnati Law Review Blog. April 27, 2016. Archived from the initial on April 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ a b c "CM-625 Authentic Occupational Qualifications". US EEOC. January 2, 1982. Archived from the initial on December 12, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ a b "United Automobile Workers v. Johnson Controls, 499 U.S. 187 (1991 )". Justia Law. Archived from the initial on December 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ "Dothard v. Rawlinson, 433 U.S. 321 (1977 )". Justia Law. Archived from the original on December 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ "Religious Discrimination - Workplace Fairness". www.workplacefairness.org. Archived from the initial on November 12, 2023. Retrieved August 20, 2019.
^ "Questions and Answers about Religious Discrimination in the Workplace". www.eeoc.gov. January 31, 2011. Archived from the initial on March 5, 2020. Retrieved August 20, 2019.
^ "Sincerely Held or Suddenly Held Religious Exemptions to Vaccination?". www.americanbar.org. Archived from the original on December 19, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ Thom Patterson (November 10, 2016). "Prepare yourself for more US women in fight". CNN. Archived from the original on April 19, 2023. Retrieved August 20, 2019.
^ http://www.militaryaerospace.com/blogs/mil-aero-blog/2012/12/conspicuous-gallantry-doris-miller-at-pearl-harbor-was-one-of-world-war-ii-s-first-heroes.html Archived May 30, 2023, at the Wayback Machine [1] ^ Gates, Henry Louis; Root, Jr|Originally published on The (January 14, 2013). "Segregation in the Armed Forces During World War II|African American History Blog". The African Americans: Many Rivers to Cross. Archived from the initial on June 21, 2020. Retrieved August 20, 2019.
^ a b "USERRA - Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act". DOL. Archived from the original on December 11, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ a b "Personnel Adm'r of Massachusetts v. Feeney, 442 U.S. 256 (1979 )". Justia Law. Archived from the original on December 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ "FindLaw's United States Supreme Court case and opinions". Findlaw. Archived from the original on August 25, 2019. Retrieved August 20, 2019.
^ "Shaping Employment Discrimination Law". Archived from the initial on May 11, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009.
^ "Federal Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Laws". Archived from the original on August 6, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009.
^ "Pre 1965: Events Resulting In the Creation of EEOC". Archived from the original on August 26, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009.
^ "42 U.S. Code § 2000e-5 - Enforcement arrangements". LII/ Legal Information Institute. Archived from the initial on November 1, 2019. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "PART 1614-- FEDERAL SECTOR EQUAL JOB OPPORTUNITY". Archived from the original on July 27, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009.
^ a b "Filing a Charge of Employment Discrimination". Archived from the original on August 12, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009.
^ "The Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Section 503". Archived from the initial on August 2, 2009. Retrieved August 1, 2009.
^ "An Introduction of the Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices". Archived from the original on May 31, 2009. Retrieved July 30, 2009.
External links

Directory of state labor departments, from the U.S. Department of Labor
Disability Discrimination, by the U.S. Equal Job Opportunity Commission
Sex-Based Discrimination, by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Your Rights At Work (Connecticut).
- Barnes, Patricia G., (2014 ), Betrayed: The Legalization of Age Discrimination in the Workplace. The author, a lawyer and judge, argues that the U.S. Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 fails to safeguard older employees. Weak to begin with, she states that the ADEA has actually been devitalized by the U.S. Supreme Court.
- Tweedy, Ann E. and Karen Yescavage, Employment Discrimination Against Bisexuals: An Empirical Study, 21 Wm. & Mary J. Women & L.