Employment discrimination law in the United States stems from the common law, and is codified in many state, federal, and local laws. These laws prohibit discrimination based on specific qualities or "secured categories". The United States Constitution also prohibits discrimination by federal and state governments versus their public staff members. Discrimination in the economic sector is not straight constrained by the Constitution, but has actually ended up being subject to a growing body of federal and state law, consisting of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Federal law forbids discrimination in a variety of locations, consisting of recruiting, hiring, job evaluations, promotion policies, training, settlement and disciplinary action. State laws often extend protection to additional categories or employers.

Under federal employment discrimination law, employers usually can not victimize workers on the basis of race, [1] sex [1] [2] (including sexual orientation and gender identity), [3] pregnancy, [4] religious beliefs, [1] national origin, [1] impairment (physical or mental, including status), [5] [6] age (for employees over 40), [7] military service or association, [8] personal bankruptcy or bad financial obligations, [9] hereditary information, [10] and citizenship status (for people, long-term citizens, momentary residents, refugees, and asylees). [11]

List of United States federal discrimination law

Equal Pay Act of 1963
Civil Rights Act of 1964 Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964


Title IX

Constitutional basis

The United States Constitution does not straight resolve work discrimination, however its prohibitions on discrimination by the federal government have been held to protect federal government employees.

The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution restrict the power of the federal and state federal governments to discriminate. The Fifth Amendment has a specific requirement that the federal government does not deny people of "life, liberty, or home", without due process of the law. It likewise includes an implicit assurance that the Fourteenth Amendment clearly restricts states from violating an individual's rights of due procedure and equal protection. In the work context, these Constitutional provisions would limit the right of the state and federal governments to discriminate in their employment practices by dealing with workers, previous workers, or task candidates unequally since of subscription in a group (such as a race or sex). Due process security needs that government staff members have a fair procedural process before they are ended if the termination is related to a "liberty" (such as the right to complimentary speech) or property interest. As both Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses are passive, the clause that empowers Congress to pass anti-discrimination costs (so they are not unconstitutional under Tenth Amendment) is Section 5 of Fourteenth Amendment.

Employment discrimination or harassment in the economic sector is not unconstitutional due to the fact that Federal and most State Constitutions do not specifically give their respective government the power to enact civil liberties laws that apply to the economic sector. The Federal federal government's authority to control a private business, including civil rights laws, stems from their power to regulate all commerce in between the States. Some State Constitutions do specifically afford some defense from public and private work discrimination, such as Article I of the California Constitution. However, most State Constitutions only deal with discriminatory treatment by the federal government, consisting of a public company.

Absent of an arrangement in a State Constitution, State civil rights laws that control the economic sector are normally Constitutional under the "police powers" doctrine or the power of a State to enact laws developed to secure public health, security and morals. All States must follow the Federal Civil Rights laws, but States might enact civil liberties laws that offer additional employment security.

For example, some State civil rights laws offer defense from employment discrimination on the basis of political affiliation, despite the fact that such types of discrimination are not yet covered in federal civil liberties laws.

History of federal laws

Federal law governing work discrimination has actually established with time.

The Equal Pay Act amended the Fair Labor Standards Act in 1963. It is enforced by the Wage and Hour Division of the Department of Labor. [12] The Equal Pay Act prohibits employers and unions from paying different incomes based upon sex. It does not prohibit other discriminatory practices in working with. It offers that where workers carry out equal work in the corner requiring "equal ability, effort, and responsibility and performed under similar working conditions," they should be provided equal pay. [2] The Fair Labor Standards Act applies to companies participated in some element of interstate commerce, or all of an employer's workers if the enterprise is engaged as a whole in a significant quantity of interstate commerce. [citation needed]

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination in a lot more aspects of the employment relationship. "Title VII produced the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) to administer the act". [12] It applies to most companies taken part in interstate commerce with more than 15 employees, labor organizations, and work agencies. Title VII prohibits discrimination based upon race, color, faith, sex or nationwide origin. It makes it illegal for companies to discriminate based upon safeguarded attributes regarding terms, conditions, and advantages of employment. Employment service may not discriminate when hiring or referring candidates, and labor companies are also restricted from basing subscription or union classifications on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. [1] The Pregnancy Discrimination Act changed Title VII in 1978, specifying that illegal sex discrimination consists of discrimination based on pregnancy, giving birth, and related medical conditions. [4] A related statute, the Family and Medical Leave Act, sets requirements governing leave for pregnancy and pregnancy-related conditions. [13]

Executive Order 11246 in 1965 "restricts discrimination by federal contractors and subcontractors on account of race, color, religion, sex, or nationwide origin [and] needs affirmative action by federal professionals". [14]

The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), enacted in 1968 and amended in 1978 and 1986, forbids employers from discriminating on the basis of age. The forbidden practices are nearly identical to those detailed in Title VII, other than that the ADEA secures employees in companies with 20 or more employees rather than 15 or more. A worker is protected from discrimination based upon age if she or he is over 40. Since 1978, the ADEA has actually phased out and prohibited mandatory retirement, other than for high-powered decision-making positions (that likewise supply big pensions). The ADEA includes specific guidelines for advantage, pension and retirement strategies. [7] Though ADEA is the center of a lot of conversation of age discrimination legislation, there is a longer history starting with the abolishment of "optimal ages of entry into employment in 1956" by the United States Civil Service Commission. Then in 1964, Executive Order 11141 "established a policy against age discrimination amongst federal professionals". [15]

The Rehabilitation Act of 1973 restricts employment discrimination on the basis of impairment by the federal government, federal professionals with agreements of more than $10,000, and programs getting federal monetary support. [16] It requires affirmative action along with non-discrimination. [16] Section 504 requires affordable lodging, and Section 508 requires that electronic and infotech be accessible to disabled employees. [16]

The Black Lung Benefits Act of 1972 restricts discrimination by mine operators against miners who suffer from "black lung illness" (pneumoconiosis). [17]

The Vietnam Era Readjustment Act of 1974 "needs affirmative action for disabled and Vietnam period veterans by federal contractors". [14]

The Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978 prohibits work discrimination on the basis of insolvency or uncollectable bills. [9]

The Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 prohibits employers with more than 3 staff members from discriminating against anybody (other than an unauthorized immigrant) on the basis of national origin or citizenship status. [18]

The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) was enacted to get rid of inequitable barriers versus certified individuals with disabilities, people with a record of an impairment, or individuals who are considered as having an impairment. It prohibits discrimination based on genuine or perceived physical or psychological disabilities. It also requires employers to offer sensible accommodations to workers who need them because of a special needs to obtain a task, carry out the essential functions of a task, or delight in the benefits and opportunities of employment, unless the employer can show that undue challenge will result. There are stringent restrictions on when a company can ask disability-related concerns or need medical exams, and all medical details needs to be treated as personal. An impairment is specified under the ADA as a psychological or physical health condition that "significantly limits one or more significant life activities. " [5]

The Nineteenth Century Civil Rights Acts, modified in 1993, guarantee all persons equivalent rights under the law and describe the damages offered to complainants in actions brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the 1973 Rehabilitation Act. [19] [20]

The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 bars companies from using individuals' hereditary info when making hiring, shooting, job placement, or promotion choices. [10]

The proposed US Equality Act of 2015 would ban discrimination on the basis of sexual preference or gender identity. [21] Since June 2018 [update], 28 US states do not clearly consist of sexual preference and 29 US states do not explicitly include gender identity within anti-discrimination statutes.

LGBT work discrimination

Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964 prohibits work discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity. This is encompassed by the law's prohibition of work discrimination on the basis of sex. Prior to the landmark cases Bostock v. Clayton County and R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (2020 ), employment defenses for LGBT individuals were patchwork; a number of states and regions clearly forbid harassment and predisposition in employment decisions on the basis of sexual preference and/or gender identity, although some only cover public workers. [22] Prior to the Bostock decision, the Equal Job Opportunity Commission (EEOC) analyzed Title VII to cover LGBT employees; the EEOC's figured out that transgender staff members were safeguarded under Title VII in 2012, [23] and extended the security to encompass sexual orientation in 2015. [24] [25]

According to Crosby Burns and Jeff Krehely: "Studies reveal that anywhere from 15 percent to 43 percent of gay individuals have actually experienced some form of discrimination and harassment at the work environment. Moreover, an incredible 90 percent of transgender workers report some kind of harassment or mistreatment on the task." Lots of people in the LGBT community have actually lost their task, including Vandy Beth Glenn, a transgender lady who declares that her employer told her that her presence may make other individuals feel unpleasant. [26]

Almost half of the United States also have state-level or municipal-level laws prohibiting the discrimination of gender non-conforming and transgender individuals in both public and private workplaces. A few more states prohibit LGBT discrimination in only public work environments. [27] Some opponents of these laws believe that it would intrude on religious liberty, although these laws are focused more on prejudiced actions, not beliefs. Courts have actually also recognized that these laws do not infringe totally free speech or religious liberty. [28]

State law

State statutes also supply extensive protection from work discrimination. Some laws extend comparable security as supplied by the federal acts to companies who are not covered by those statutes. Other statutes supply security to groups not covered by the federal acts. Some state laws offer higher protection to workers of the state or of state contractors.

The following table lists classifications not protected by federal law. Age is included as well, considering that federal law only covers employees over 40.

In addition,

- District of Columbia - matriculation, personal look [35]- Michigan - height, weight [53]- Texas - Participation in emergency situation evacuation order [90]- Vermont - Birthplace [76]

Civil servant

Title VII also applies to state, federal, local and other public employees. Employees of federal and state governments have additional protections against work discrimination.

The Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 forbids discrimination in federal employment on the basis of conduct that does not impact job efficiency. The Office of Personnel Management has actually analyzed this as forbiding discrimination on the basis of sexual preference. [91] In June 2009, it was announced that the interpretation would be expanded to include gender identity. [92]

Additionally, public employees keep their First Amendment rights, whereas personal employers deserve to limits staff members' speech in specific ways. [93] Public employees retain their First Amendment rights insofar as they are speaking as a personal citizen (not on behalf of their company), they are speaking on a matter of public issue, and their speech is not interfering with their job. [93]

Federal employees who have employment discrimination claims, such as postal employees of the United States Postal Service (USPS) must sue in the correct federal jurisdiction, which positions a different set of problems for plaintiffs.

Exceptions

Bona fide occupational certifications

Employers are usually enabled to think about attributes that would otherwise be prejudiced if they are authentic occupational certifications (BFOQ). The most typical BFOQ is sex, and the 2nd most common BFOQ is age. Authentic Occupational Qualifications can not be used for discrimination on the basis of race.

The only exception to this rule is shown in a single case, Wittmer v. Peters, where the court rules that police surveillance can match races when essential. For example, if police are running operations that involve personal informants, or undercover agents, sending out an African American officer into a sting for a KKK white supremacy group. Additionally, police departments, such as the department in Ferguson, Missouri, can consider race-based policing and hire officers that are proportionate to the community's racial makeup. [94]

BFOQs do not apply in the show business, such as casting for motion pictures and tv. [95] Directors, manufacturers and casting staff are allowed to cast characters based upon physical qualities, such as race, sex, hair color, eye color, weight, etc. Employment discrimination claims for Disparate Treatment are uncommon in the home entertainment industry, particularly in performers. [95] This validation is distinct to the entertainment market, and does not move to other industries, such as retail or food. [95]

Often, employers will utilize BFOQ as a defense to a Disparate Treatment theory employment discrimination. BFOQ can not be a cost validation in wage spaces in between various groups of workers. [96] Cost can be thought about when a company must stabilize privacy and safety interest in the number of positions that an employer are trying to fill. [96]

Additionally, customer choice alone can not be a reason unless there is a privacy or safety defense. [96] For example, retail facilities in rural areas can not prohibit African American clerks based on the racial ideologies of the client base. But, matching genders for staffing at facilities that handle children survivors of sexual assault is allowed.

If a company were attempting to show that work discrimination was based on a BFOQ, there should be an accurate basis for believing that all or significantly all members of a class would be unable to perform the task securely and effectively or that it is impractical to figure out certifications on a personalized basis. [97] Additionally, lack of a malicious motive does not transform a facially prejudiced policy into a neutral policy with an inequitable result. [97] Employers also bring the concern to show that a BFOQ is fairly required, and a lower prejudiced alternative method does not exist. [98]

Religious work discrimination

"Religious discrimination is treating people in a different way in their employment due to the fact that of their faith, their faiths and practices, and/or their demand for accommodation (a change in an office guideline or policy) of their religious beliefs and practices. It likewise consists of treating people in a different way in their work due to the fact that of their absence of religion or practice" (Workplace Fairness). [99] According to The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, employers are prohibited from refusing to work with an individual based upon their religious beliefs- alike race, sex, age, and special needs. If a staff member believes that they have actually experienced spiritual discrimination, they must address this to the alleged transgressor. On the other hand, workers are safeguarded by the law for reporting task discrimination and have the ability to file charges with the EEOC. [100] Some areas in the U.S. now have provisions that prohibit discrimination versus atheists. The courts and laws of the United States give specific exemptions in these laws to organizations or institutions that are spiritual or religiously-affiliated, nevertheless, to varying degrees in various places, depending on the setting and the context; some of these have actually been upheld and others reversed with time.

The most current and prevalent example of Religious Discrimination is the prevalent rejection of the COVID-19 Vaccine. Many staff members are using religions versus modifying the body and preventative medicine as a reason to not get the vaccination. Companies that do not enable employees to make an application for religious exemptions, or reject their application might be charged by the worker with work discrimination on the basis of religious beliefs. However, there are particular requirements for workers to present evidence that it is a seriously held belief. [101]

Members of the Communist Party

Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964 explicitly permits discrimination against members of the Communist Party.

Military

The military has dealt with criticism for restricting females from serving in battle functions. In 2016, however, the law was modified to allow them to serve. [102] [103] [104] In the post posted on the PBS website, Henry Louis Gates Jr. composes about the method which black males were dealt with in the military throughout the 1940s. According to Gates, during that time the whites provided the African Americans a possibility to prove themselves as Americans by having them take part in the war. The National Geographic site states, however, that when black soldiers joined the Navy, they were only enabled to work as servants; their involvement was restricted to the functions of mess attendants, stewards, and cooks. Even when African Americans wanted to safeguard the nation they lived in, they were denied the power to do so.

The Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) protects the job rights of people who willingly or involuntarily leave work positions to carry out military service or particular kinds of service in the National Disaster Medical System. [105] The law also prohibits companies from discriminating versus workers for past or present involvement or membership in the uniformed services. [105] Policies that offer choice to veterans versus non-veterans has actually been declared to enforce systemic disparate treatment of ladies due to the fact that there is a large underrepresentation of women in the uniformed services. [106] The court has rejected this claim since there was no inequitable intent towards females in this veteran friendly policy. [106]

Unintentional discrimination

Employment practices that do not straight discriminate versus a safeguarded category might still be unlawful if they produce a disparate effect on members of a safeguarded group. Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964 forbids employment practices that have an inequitable impact, unless they relate to task performance.

The Act needs the removal of artificial, arbitrary, and unneeded barriers to work that run invidiously to discriminate on the basis of race, and, if, as here, an employment practice that operates to exclude Negroes can not be shown to be associated with job performance, it is restricted, regardless of the employer's lack of discriminatory intent. [107]

Height and weight requirements have actually been determined by the EEOC as having a disparate effect on nationwide origin minorities. [108]

When safeguarding against a diverse impact claim that alleges age discrimination, an employer, nevertheless, does not require to show requirement; rather, it should simply show that its practice is reasonable. [citation required]

Enforcing entities

The Equal Job Opportunity Commission (EEOC) analyzes and enforces the Equal Pay Act, Age Discrimination in Employment Act, Title VII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1964, Title I and V of the Americans With Disabilities Act, Sections 501 and 505 of the Rehabilitation Act, and the Civil Liberty Act of 1991. [109] The Commission was developed by the Civil liberty Act of 1964. [110] Its enforcement provisions are included in section 2000e-5 of Title 42, [111] and its policies and standards are consisted of in Title 29 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 1614. [112] Persons wishing to file match under Title VII and/or the ADA must tire their administrative solutions by submitting an administrative grievance with the EEOC prior to submitting their suit in court. [113]

The Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs implements Section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act, which restricts discrimination against certified individuals with specials needs by federal specialists and subcontractors. [114]

Under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, each company has and enforces its own regulations that apply to its own programs and to any entities that receive monetary assistance. [16]

The Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices (OSC) imposes the anti-discrimination provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. § 1324b, which forbids discrimination based upon citizenship status or national origin. [115]

State Fair Employment Practices (FEP) workplaces play the EEOC in administering state statutes. [113]

See also

Employment Non-Discrimination Act
LGBT work discrimination in the United States
Employment discrimination versus individuals with criminal records in the United States
Racial wage space in the United States
Gender pay space in the United States
Criticism of credit history systems in the United States


References

^ a b c d e "Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964". US EEOC. Archived from the initial on December 20, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "The Equal Pay Act of 1963". Archived from the original on April 5, 2020. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ Bostock v. Clayton County, 590 U.S. ___ (2020 ).
^ a b "Pregnancy Discrimination Act". Archived from the original on May 12, 2009. Retrieved June 18, 2009.
^ a b "Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, As Amended". ADA.gov. Archived from the original on December 20, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Questions and Answers: The Americans with Disabilities Act and Persons with HIV/AIDS". Archived from the initial on July 22, 2009. Retrieved July 21, 2009.
^ a b "The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967". Archived from the initial on December 13, 2019. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "USERRA - Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act". DOL. Archived from the original on December 11, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b 11 U.S.C. § 525
^ a b "Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008" (PDF). gpo.gov. May 21, 2008. Archived (PDF) from the initial on November 6, 2018. Retrieved January 6, 2015.
^ 8 U.S.C. § 1324b
^ a b Blankenship, Kim M (1993 ). "Bringing Gender and Race in: U.S. Employment Discrimination Policy". Gender and Society. 7 (2 ): 204-226. doi:10.1177/ 089124393007002004. JSTOR 189578. S2CID 144175260.
^ "Family and Medical Leave Act". Archived from the initial on June 18, 2009. Retrieved June 18, 2009.
^ a b Rozmarin, George C (1980 ). "Employment Discrimination Laws and Their Application". Law Notes for the General Practitioner. 16 (1 ): 25-29. JSTOR 44066330.
^ Neumark, D (2003 ). "Age discrimination legislations in the United States" (PDF). Contemporary Economic Policy. 21 (3 ): 297-317. doi:10.1093/ cep/byg012. S2CID 38171380. Archived (PDF) from the original on June 2, 2018. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c d "Guide to Disability Rights Laws". ADA.gov. December 20, 2023. Archived from the initial on November 14, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "30 USC Sec. 938". Archived from the original on June 7, 2011. Retrieved July 21, 2009.
^ "Summary of Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986". Archived from the original on May 6, 2013. Retrieved August 14, 2021.
^ "42 U.S. Code § 1981 - Equal rights under the law". LII/ Legal Information Institute. Archived from the original on December 16, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "42 U.S. Code § 1981a - Damages in cases of intentional discrimination in work". LII/ Legal Information Institute. Archived from the initial on November 27, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA)". Archived from the initial on June 17, 2009. Retrieved June 18, 2009.
^ Tilcsik, András (January 1, 2011). "Pride and Prejudice: Employment Discrimination against Openly Gay Men in the United States". American Journal of Sociology. 117 (2 ): 586-626. doi:10.1086/ 661653. hdl:1807/ 34998. JSTOR 10.1086/ 661653. PMID 22268247. S2CID 23542996. Archived from the original on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "In Landmark Ruling, Feds Add Transgendered to Anti-Discrimination Law:: EDGE Boston, MA". Edgeboston.com. April 25, 2012. Archived from the initial on April 15, 2019. Retrieved July 17, 2015.
^ Carpenter, Dale (December 14, 2012). "Anti-gay discrimination is sex discrimination, says the EEOC". The Washington Post. Archived from the initial on April 15, 2019. Retrieved July 17, 2015.
^ Tatectate, Curtis. "EEOC: Federal law bans office bias against gays, lesbians, bisexuals|Miami Herald Miami Herald". Miamiherald.com. Archived from the original on April 28, 2019. Retrieved July 17, 2015.
^ Burns, Crosby; Krehely, Jeff (June 2, 2011). "Gay and Transgender People Face High Rates of Workplace Discrimination and Harassment". Center for American Progress. Archived from the initial on November 26, 2019. Retrieved March 1, 2015.
^ "Sexual Preference Discrimination in the Workplace". FindLaw. Archived from the initial on May 7, 2021. Retrieved March 1, 2015.
^ Lowndes, Coleman; Maza, Carlos (September 23, 2014). "The Top Five Myths About LGBT Non-Discrimination Laws Debunked". Media Matters for America. Archived from the original on June 17, 2019. Retrieved March 1, 2015.
^ "Code of Alabama 25-1-21". Archived from the initial on July 23, 2011. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ a b c "Alaska Statutes: AS 18.80.220. Unlawful Employment Practices; Exception". touchngo.com. Archived from the initial on December 6, 2022. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c d e f "Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA)". California Department of Fair Employment and Housing. CA.gov. 2010. Archived from the initial on September 9, 2016. Retrieved September 9, 2016.
^ a b "Colorado Civil Rights Division 2008 Statutes" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the initial on May 21, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "Chapter 814c Sec. 46a-60". Archived from the initial on October 17, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ a b "Delaware Code Online". delcode.delaware.gov. Archived from the initial on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c d e "District of Columbia Human Rights Act of 1977; Prohibited Acts of Discrimination" (PDF). Archived from the initial (PDF) on July 23, 2009. Retrieved August 8, 2019. ^ "District of Columbia Human Rights Act of 1977; Table of Contents, General Provisions" (PDF). Archived from the initial (PDF) on July 30, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ a b "Statutes & Constitution: View Statutes:-> 2008-> Ch0760-> Section 10: Online Sunshine". www.leg.state.fl.us. Archived from the initial on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Georgia Fair Employment Practices Act". Archived from the original on January 29, 2010. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ a b "Hawaii Rev Statutes 378-2". Archived from the original on August 14, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Idaho Commission on Human Rights: Age Discrimination"". Archived from the initial on February 21, 2018. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c "Illinois Human Rights Act". Archived from the initial on April 20, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "Indiana General Assembly". iga.in.gov. Archived from the initial on December 25, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Iowa Code 216.6". Archived from the initial on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Kansas Age Discrimination in Employment Act" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the initial on October 6, 2008. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "Kentucky Revised Statutes 344.040" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on October 8, 2009.
^ "Louisiana Revised Statutes 23:352". Archived from the original on May 9, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Louisiana Revised Statutes 23:312". Archived from the original on May 9, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Louisiana Revised Statutes 23:311". Archived from the original on May 9, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Title 5, Chapter 337: HUMAN RIGHTS ACT". www.mainelegislature.org. Archived from the original on February 28, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "Annotated Code of Maryland 49B.16". Archived from the initial on September 29, 2011. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "M.G.L. 151B § 4". Archived from the initial on July 7, 2010. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "M.G.L 151B § 1". Archived from the original on June 4, 2010. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c "Elliott-Larsen Civil liberty Act" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on December 26, 2014. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c "Minnesota Statutes, area 363A.08". Archived from the initial on September 6, 2015. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ " § 213.055 R.S.Mo". Archived from the original on May 23, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "Montana Code Annotated 49-2-303". Archived from the original on September 1, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ a b "Nebraska Fair Employment Practices Act". Archived from the original on November 26, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ a b "NRS: CHAPTER 613 - EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES". www.leg.state.nv.us. Archived from the original on December 24, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "Section 354-A:7 Unlawful Discriminatory Practices". Archived from the original on January 2, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c d "New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (N.J.S.A. 10:5 -12)".
^ a b c "2006 New Mexico Statutes - Section 28-1-7 - Unlawful discriminatory practice". Justia Law. Archived from the original on September 28, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c "New York State Executive Law, employment Article 15, Section 296". Archived from the initial on October 4, 2011. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ a b "New York Labor Law Section 201-D - Discrimination versus the engagement in certain activities. - New York City Attorney Resources - New York City Laws". law.onecle.com. Archived from the initial on April 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ " § 95-28". www.ncleg.net. Archived from the original on April 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ " § 95-28". www.ncleg.net. Archived from the original on December 15, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c d "North Dakota Human Rights Act" (PDF). Archived from the initial (PDF) on July 18, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ "2006 Ohio Revised Code -:: 4112. Civil Rights Commission". Justia Law. Archived from the original on March 9, 2016. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Oklahoma Chief Law Officer|". www.oag.ok.gov. Archived from the original on December 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c "Oregon Revised Statutes, Chapter 659A". Archived from the original on August 16, 2023. Retrieved October 17, 2019.
^ "Laws Administered by the Pennsylvania Human Rights Commission" (PDF). [irreversible dead link] ^ "State of Rhode Island General Assembly". www.rilegislature.gov. Archived from the original on October 14, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "South Carolina Human Affairs Law". Archived from the original on May 6, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ "Tennessee State Government - TN.gov". www.tn.gov. Archived from the initial on December 25, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "LABOR CODE CHAPTER 21. EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION". statutes.capitol.texas.gov. Archived from the original on September 25, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Utah Code 34A-5-106". Archived from the original on July 21, 2009. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "Vermont Fair Employment Practices Act" (PDF). Archived from the initial (PDF) on June 1, 2009. Retrieved July 27, 2009.
^ "Virginia Human Rights Act". Archived from the initial on December 26, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b "RCW 49.60.180: Unfair practices of companies". apps.leg.wa.gov. Archived from the original on November 29, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "RCW 49.60.172: Unfair practices with respect to HIV or liver disease C infection". apps.leg.wa.gov. Archived from the original on April 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "RCW 49.60.174: Evaluation of claim of discrimination-Actual or perceived HIV or liver disease C infection". apps.leg.wa.gov. Archived from the initial on April 20, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "RCW 49.44.090: Unfair practices in work since of age of worker or applicant-Exceptions". apps.leg.wa.gov. Archived from the initial on April 19, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "State of West Virginia" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on February 16, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ a b c d "Wisconsin Statutes Table of Contents". docs.legis.wisconsin.gov. Archived from the initial on November 3, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ Wyoming Code 27-9-105 [permanent dead link] ^ "22 Guam Code Ann. Chapter 3" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on July 19, 2011. Retrieved July 29, 2009.
^ "22 Guam Code Ann. Chapter 5" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on July 19, 2011. Retrieved July 29, 2009.
^ a b "Puerto Rico Laws 29-I-7-146". Archived from the initial on February 20, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Puerto Rico Laws PR 29-I-7-151". Archived from the original on February 20, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Virgin Islands Code on Employment Discrimination § 451". Archived from the initial on February 16, 2012. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "LABOR CODE CHAPTER 22. EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION FOR PARTICIPATING IN EMERGENCY EVACUATION". statutes.capitol.texas.gov. Archived from the original on June 29, 2023. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "Addressing Sexual Orientation Discrimination In Federal Civilian Employment: A Guide to Employee's Rights". Archived from the initial on January 14, 2007.
^ Rutenberg, Jim (June 24, 2009). "New Protections for Transgender Federal Workers (Published 2009)". The New York City Times. Archived from the initial on April 20, 2023.
^ a b "Federal Employee Speech & the First Amendment|ACLU of DC". www.acludc.org. November 9, 2017. Archived from the original on September 21, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ "Justice Department Announces Findings of Two Civil Liberties Investigations in Ferguson, Missouri". www.justice.gov. March 4, 2015. Archived from the initial on August 12, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ a b c "When is it legal for a company to discriminate in their employing practices based on an Authentic Occupation Qualification?". University of Cincinnati Law Review Blog. April 27, 2016. Archived from the original on April 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ a b c "CM-625 Bona Fide Occupational Qualifications". US EEOC. January 2, 1982. Archived from the original on December 12, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ a b "United Automobile Workers v. Johnson Controls, 499 U.S. 187 (1991 )". Justia Law. Archived from the original on December 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ "Dothard v. Rawlinson, 433 U.S. 321 (1977 )". Justia Law. Archived from the initial on December 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ "Religious Discrimination - Workplace Fairness". www.workplacefairness.org. Archived from the initial on November 12, 2023. Retrieved August 20, 2019.
^ "Questions and Answers about Religious Discrimination in the Workplace". www.eeoc.gov. January 31, 2011. Archived from the initial on March 5, 2020. Retrieved August 20, 2019.
^ "Sincerely Held or Suddenly Held Religious Exemptions to Vaccination?". www.americanbar.org. Archived from the original on December 19, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ Thom Patterson (November 10, 2016). "Prepare yourself for more US women in combat". CNN. Archived from the initial on April 19, 2023. Retrieved August 20, 2019.
^ http://www.militaryaerospace.com/blogs/mil-aero-blog/2012/12/conspicuous-gallantry-doris-miller-at-pearl-harbor-was-one-of-world-war-ii-s-first-heroes.html Archived May 30, 2023, at the Wayback Machine [1] ^ Gates, Henry Louis; Root, Jr|Originally published on The (January 14, 2013). "Segregation in the Army During World War II|African American History Blog". The African Americans: Many Rivers to Cross. Archived from the initial on June 21, 2020. Retrieved August 20, 2019.
^ a b "USERRA - Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act". DOL. Archived from the original on December 11, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ a b "Personnel Adm'r of Massachusetts v. Feeney, 442 U.S. 256 (1979 )". Justia Law. Archived from the original on December 18, 2023. Retrieved April 14, 2023.
^ "FindLaw's United States Supreme Court case and opinions". Findlaw. Archived from the initial on August 25, 2019. Retrieved August 20, 2019.
^ "Shaping Employment Discrimination Law". Archived from the initial on May 11, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009.
^ "Federal Equal Job Opportunity (EEO) Laws". Archived from the original on August 6, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009.
^ "Pre 1965: Events Causing the Creation of EEOC". Archived from the original on August 26, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009.
^ "42 U.S. Code § 2000e-5 - Enforcement arrangements". LII/ Legal Information Institute. Archived from the original on November 1, 2019. Retrieved December 26, 2023.
^ "PART 1614-- FEDERAL SECTOR EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY". Archived from the initial on July 27, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009.
^ a b "Filing a Charge of Employment Discrimination". Archived from the initial on August 12, 2009. Retrieved July 28, 2009.
^ "The Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Section 503". Archived from the original on August 2, 2009. Retrieved August 1, 2009.
^ "An Overview of the Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices". Archived from the initial on May 31, 2009. Retrieved July 30, 2009.
External links

Directory of state labor departments, from the U.S. Department of Labor
Disability Discrimination, by the U.S. Equal Job Opportunity Commission
Sex-Based Discrimination, by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Your Rights At Work (Connecticut).
- Barnes, Patricia G., (2014 ), Betrayed: The Legalization of Age Discrimination in the Workplace. The author, an attorney and judge, argues that the U.S. Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 stops working to protect older employees. Weak to begin with, she specifies that the ADEA has actually been devitalized by the U.S. Supreme Court.
- Tweedy, Ann E. and Karen Yescavage, Employment Discrimination Against Bisexuals: An Empirical Study, 21 Wm. & Mary J. Women & L.